Strategic Affairs
China's duty-free 'deal' deepens Africa's dependency
The policy may look like aid, but it instead locks Africa deeper into supplying low-value commodities while expand Beijing's economic and political grip on the continent.
![Chinese Vice President Han Zheng meets with South African Deputy President Paul Mashatile in Beijing, China, on July 17, 2025. [LIU Weibing/XINHUA/AFP]](/gc7/images/2026/03/23/55016-afp__20250717__xxjpbee007512_20250717_pepfn0a001__v1__highres__chinabeijinghanzhengs-370_237.webp)
Global Watch |
Beijing's decision to grant 100 percent duty-free access to goods from 53 African countries starting May 1, 2026, has been welcomed as a major breakthrough.
Announced by President Xi Jinping at the African Union summit in February, the policy eliminates tariffs on every product for nations maintaining ties with China.
Yet beneath headlines of boosted exports lies a strategy to lock in China's dominance rather than foster genuine African development.
That logic fits a broader pattern in which Beijing uses trade, infrastructure and multilateral diplomacy simultaneously to deepen its influence, presenting itself as a champion of South-South cooperation while shaping institutions and commercial routes in its own favor.
![This photo taken on June 12, 2025, shows guests talking prior to the opening ceremony of the fourth China-Africa Economic and Trade Expo in Changsha, central China's Hunan Province. [Jin Liangkuai/XINHUA/AFP]](/gc7/images/2026/03/23/55017-afp__20250614__xxjpbee007309_20250614_pepfn0a001__v1__highres__xinhuaheadlinesfromsa-370_237.webp)
Trade between China and Africa hit $348 billion last year, but the pattern is lopsided.
Africa exports raw minerals, oil and unprocessed goods while importing Chinese manufactured goods, sustaining a $60 billion deficit. The zero-tariff policy accelerates this imbalance without addressing the underlying flaws.
Raw dependency deepens
Most coverage highlights gains for farmers and miners.
Less noted is the risk of locking Africa into supplying low-value commodities.
Brookings Institution expert Yun Sun warned in January: "Unless the policy facilitates capacity building and industrialization, a zero-tariff policy may just deepen Africa's status as the supplier of raw materials."
African exports remain dominated by minerals (40 percent) and raw materials.
Agricultural shipments, despite "green channels," constitute only a fraction of trade.
Without investment in processing plants, skills and technology transfer, the policy simply cheapens China's access to cobalt, copper and oil — while Africa loses higher-value jobs and revenue from domestic refining.
Beijing's own Belt and Road model has been described in related reporting as one that eases the export of poorer countries' raw materials to China, underscoring why tariff relief alone does not guarantee industrial upgrading.
Critics point out that past preferential schemes failed to spark industrial growth due to lack of enforcement for local value addition.
African manufacturers already compete against cheap Chinese imports; the new incentives tilt further toward exporting raw goods instead of building domestic industries.
Chinese companies win twice
In supply chains like the Democratic Republic of Congo's cobalt mines, Chinese firms control operations through investment.
They now ship raw ore back tariff-free, profiting twice: once as the as seller and once as the buyer.
As The Diplomat's Bonnie Girard noted, "the irony is that it helps Chinese companies on both sides of the transaction."
Value-added processing and jobs consequently shift to China.
Environmental and labor issues in these mines, including child labor cases, face less pressure for reform under the tariff-free flow.
This extends Beijing's leverage beyond trade. Economic dependence strengthens political influence, from UN votes to the "one China" policy.
The exclusion of Eswatini, which recognizes Taiwan, sends a clear signal.
Long-term risks are significant.
Without industrial progress, the policy could undermine Africa's Continental Free Trade Area goals and expose the continent to commodity price swings.
Chinese control of critical minerals bolsters its green-energy dominance, leaving African nations as price-takers rather than battery or solar producers.
Western initiatives like the US African Growth and Opportunity Act included rules for local processing. China's model, by contrast, preserves a status quo that suits its factories and geopolitics.
African leaders rightly welcome market access.
The danger is mistaking short-term gains for transformation. As analysts caution, true partnership demands the capacity building that Africa must demand.
Without it, today's "gift" risks becoming tomorrow's constraint, tightening China's economic and political orbit while Africa's industrial dreams fade.